Les Amis de Meadowbrook has created this inspiring calendar to show the natural beauty of the flora and fauna on the 57-hectares of Meadowbrook
Back page images of January to December double click to enlarge
Empêcher le développement de Meadowbrook et le transformer en Parc Meadowbrook, un nouveau parc nature de 57 hectares, ouvert et accessible à tous les résidents de l’Île de Montréal et relié par une trame verte à un réseau de parcs dont, notamment, la falaise Saint-Jacques.
Our mission is to protect Meadowbrook from development and transform it into Meadowbrook Park, a new 57-hectare nature park open and accessible to all Montreal Islanders and connected through a greenway to a network of parks including the Falaise Saint-Jacques.
|
Pour lire cliquez ici: Résumé des données principles concernant le terrain Meadowbrook
Même si la Ville de Montréal a annoncé en octobre 2010 qu’elle refusait la proposition actuelle de Groupe Pacifique – en l’occurrence celle de construire 1500 condos sur Meadowbrook – rien n’est encore gagné. La Ville ne s’est pas encore engagée à transformer Meadowbrook en parc nature et n’a pas fait la promesse concrète d’empêcher tout développement sur ce site dans les années à venir !
Dans un premier temps, la Ville doit modifier le zonage résidentiel actuel à celui de zonage récréatif et elle doit le faire dans les plus brefs délais.
Vous pouvez apporter votre aide en écrivant au maire Tremblay. Téléchargez la lettre modèle#1 cliques ici OU la lettre modèle#2 cliques ici
Comment utiliser les modèles pour votre propre courriel ou lettre
1. copiez la lettre modèle de votre choix (ci-dessus);
2. personnalisez-la avec votre nom et adresse;
3. ajoutez vos propres opinions et préoccupations;
4. envoyez votre lettre par courriel au maire Tremblay : maire@ville.montreal.qc.ca OU postez-la en vous référant à l’adresse sur la lettre modèle;
5. Envoyez une copie de votre lettre ou courriel aux personnes mentionnées au bas de la lettre modèle.
Michael Applebaum, Président du comité exécutif – mapplebaum@ville.montreal.qc.ca
Claude Dauphin, Maire de l’arrondissement de Lachine – cdauphin@ville.montreal.qc.ca
Alan DeSousa, Vice-président du comité exécutif – adesousa@ville.montreal.qc.ca
Louise Harel, Chef, Vision Montréal,louise.harel@ville.montreal.qc.ca
Richard Bergeron, Chef, Project Montréal richard.bergeron@ville.montreal,qc.ca
lesmisdeeadowbrook@gmail.com
Although the City of Montreal announced in October 2010 that it refused the proposal by Groupe Pacific to build 1,500 condos on Meadowbrook, we are not out of the woods. The city still hasn’t committed to turning Meadowbrook into a nature park, and it still hasn’t given any concrete assurances that development can’t happen in the future!
As a first step, the city has to change its Meadowbrook zoning from residential to recreational, and it has to do this quickly!
You can help out by writing to Mayor Tremblay. Download Sample Letter #1 click here OR Sample Letter #2 click here
Thank you for your help in the fight to make Meadowbrook Nature Park a reality!
How to use the sample letters for your personal emails and letters
OR post it by regular mail using the address on the sample letter.
5. Email or mail a copy of your letter to those listed at the bottom of the letter as follows:
Michael Applebaum, Président du comité exécutif – mapplebaum@ville.montreal.qc.ca
Claude Dauphin, Maire de l’arrondissement de Lachine – cdauphin@ville.montreal.qc.ca
Alan DeSousa, Vice-président du comité exécutif – adesousa@ville.montreal.qc.ca
Louise Harel, Leader, Vision Montréal – louise.harel@ville.montreal.qc.ca
Richard Bergeron, Leader, Project Montréal – richard.bergeron@ville.montreal,qc.ca
Les Amis de Meadowbrook – lesmisdeeadowbrook@gmail.com
By ERICA BROWN, The Gazette February 24, 2011
We’ll never know how W Sir William Van Horne would have reacted to the destruction in 1973 of his mansion at Sherbrooke and Stanley Sts. because the railway tycoon and builder of the Canadian Pacific Railway died in 1915.
We do know that on the evening the Victorian builing was demolished, John Colicos, who portrayed Van Horne in the CBC miniseries The National Dream, called the wrecking “a shame and a disgrace.” By morning, the last remaining Canadian example of a Collonna Art Nouveau interior was mounds of rubble.
The demolition was a hinge event, marking a turning point for Montreal’s architectural heritage that remained in private hands. Like campaigning Venuses emerging from dusty waves of debris, groups of citizens arose, intent on historic and cultural preservation. They would continue to prod the city administration to create bylaws protecting heritage zones and restricting development, realizing the truth of what Thomas Fuller wrote in the mid-18th century, “We never know the worth of water till the well is dry.”
Now another Van Horne legacy, the 57 sylvan hectares of Meadowbrook Golf Club, faces the threat of development. The club, formerly the Canadian Pacific Recreation Association’s park for its railway workers and a golf course since the 1920s, has been a bone of contention between citizens who want to preserve the green space intact, and the developer Group Pacific who wants to build condos on it.
Last fall Alan DeSousa, vice-chair of Montreal’s executive committee, announced that the city would not approve the developer’s plans for Meadowbrook. Future development still remains possible, however. Perhaps it is time to recognize that it is not only our architectural heritage that is worth preserving. We have a landscape heritage to protect as well.
Ironically, today’s battles to protect and naturalize green spaces echo the efforts of the city’s early landscape architects to preserve what they created. The reality is that the parks in which today we cycle, play and walk our dogs were created by 19th and early-20th century visionaries. Preserving their landscape designs required civic commitment and constant vigilance, which just like today was often in short supply, and their parks’ acreage diminished as the years went by.
Creating them in the first place took commendable acts of municipal vision and a willingness to innovate. More than 135 years ago, Montreal’s parks were born during a golden age of landscape architecture. In 1874, Montreal hired Frederick Law Olmsted of New York’s Central Park fame, to create a park out of the Royal Montreal Golf Club and the hobby farms situated on Fletcher’s Field on the east side of Mount Royal. It was not alone. Parc Lafontaine was established from a British garrison on land that was once the experimental farm of James Logan. Angrignon Parc, then countryside and fox-hunting grounds, was saved from development by the city of Verdun in 1930. Parc des Rapides and Parc Dorval were transformed from golf courses, and Parc Maisonneuve, which originally contained a golf course, was protected when the Olympic Park was created.
The first to use the term “landscape architect,” Olmsted gifted Montreal with the English garden look and with his experience, convincing city hall to create green havens for city dwellers. Holding that “lives are shortened and made painful by city air,” he designed the winding trails and soothing vistas that mark his parks. Presciently, Olmsted also predicted the ills of littering, pollution, and city blight, long before doing so became common wisdom.
Olmsted’s acolyte, Frederick Todd, arrived in Montreal from Massachusetts in 1900 to work with his mentor and never left. Todd turned Olmsted’s precepts into public and private projects across Canada, producing gems that inhabitants take for granted.
Todd certainly left his mark on Montreal. Because of him we have Beaver Lake, created on a site originally chosen by Olmsted and appropriately over an ancient beaver dam. Todd designed the Town of Mount Royal and the chalet on the mountain, and transformed the deserted garrison of Île Ste. Hélène into a park.
In the late 1950s, another visionary, Montreal Parks director Claude Robillard, tried to revive the city’s illustrious heritage of acquiring private lands for the public park system, declaring that 15 per cent of Montreal land should be reserved as green space. His message often fell on the deaf ears of Jean Drapeau, who clearly believed that If We Build It, Tourists Will Come.
It’s not a bad idea to raise ghosts for good causes. Every time we’re in a Montreal park, we’d do well to remember what we owe to Robillard, Olmsted and Todd. Olmsted’s warning that it’s impossible to recapture space to which urbanites can escape is timely given Meadowbrook’s uncertain future. Just as gardeners know that to naturalize and maintain the picturesque takes effort, we should apply equal effort to reclaim our landscape heritage.
Olmstead was right in his own day, and he remains so today, when he said: “conserve, protect, build only what is necessary.”
Erica Brown is a freelance writer and editor living in N.D.G.
Read more: Link
HEAT ISLAND - an investigative Story by WILLIAM MARSDEN
The Gazette 29 Jan 2011
http://www.montrealgazette.com/technology/Cities+feeling+heat/4189913/story.html
Highlights that pertain to saving GREEN SPACES on the Island of Montreal
That passivity, he claimed, is in the past. Time is running out.
“An energy efficient city that is well adapted to climate change will be more
livable and therefore more attractive to business
“We expect to see a growing competition among clean cities.”[according to Andrew Steer,
the World Bank’s special envoy for climate change]
Alan DeSousa ‘s comments:
Conference par Me Suzanne Deschamps, Groupe Pacific, pour Forum URBA 2015, Wednesday, 27 janvier
Les Amis de Meadowbrook documentation que les élèves et les participants. Pour lire: Petite Rivière, Beau projet mauvais endroit
Document available only in French. To read click here: Petite_Rivière,_Beau_projet_mauvais_endroit